Seagull Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
364136891
IRS 990-PF coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2025
Location
Ponte Vedra, FL, USA
Phone
3126945407
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Private Grantmaking Foundations

Reported finances

Revenue
$-16,512
Expenses
$55,514

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

Private Grantmaking Foundations

What it reported funding in 2025

The foundation reported 6 grants totaling $55,000. The stated grant purposes included food pantry fund, education ministries, and mit annual fund, plus 3 other reported purposes.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The foundation distributed 100% of its reported charitable disbursements as grants.
  • Includes asset-sale income: Asset-sale income is shown separately from recurring resources when classifying the revenue model.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes to charitable grants and the filing identifies who received its grants. Assets provide a limited cushion relative to annual grants and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: 81
  • Cost Efficiency: 99
  • Transparency: 100
  • Compliance: 78
  • Endowment Health: 29

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: 80.6%; rating input score 81; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 99.1%; rating input score 99; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100

Compliance

  • Part VII-B activity disclosures: 17 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
    • Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
    • Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Payment to a government official: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
    • Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
    • Excess business holdings: Pass
    • Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
    • Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
    • Attempt to influence an election: Pass
    • Grants to individuals: Pass
    • Grants to organizations: Pass
    • Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
    • Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Missing
    • Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Missing
    • Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
  • Filing consistency checks: 6; rating input score 67

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: 12.1; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
  • Payout: 80.6% grant deployment rate
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
  • Investments: 29th percentile for endowment coverage
  • Consistency: 6 of 9 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Endowment Health: Endowment-health comparison scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Assets equal liabilities and net assets did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Balance sheet boy total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Balance sheet eoy total did not reconcile in the filed values.