Seabreeze High School Cheer Boosters Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883039232
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Daytona Beach, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3868825699
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $117,261
- Expenses
- $98,380
- Assets
- $52,246
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- jonathan bunch (president)
- amy hammerlie (Vice president)
People named in this filing
- jonathan bunch (president)
- amy hammerlie (Vice president)
- tara olsen (treasuer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization supports and promotes high school cheerleading by providing financial assistance, equipment, uniforms, training opportunities, and program support for student athletes. Funds are raised through donations, sponsorships, and community events to help offset participation costs and enhance the cheer program. The organization also assists with camps, competitions, team activities, and related expenses to ensure students have the resources necessary to participate safely and successfully in school-sponsored cheerleading activities. The booster club operates exclusively for charitable and educational purposes to benefit student athletes and the school cheer program.
What it reported doing in 2025
Competition fees expenses
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 60.8%; rating input score 61
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.1%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 35.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51% of revenue deployed · 60.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $60K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.