Sd Research Center Inc C/o Paul Cardile

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205720978
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2126280606
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Art Museums

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$18,414
Assets
$335
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PAUL CARDILE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PAUL CARDILE (PRESIDENT)
  • VIVIAN EBERSMAN (TREASURER)
  • BARBARA FISCHMAN (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The sd research center, inc. Has been established as an impartial and scholarly resource for the work and life of one of the seminal artists of the 20th century, salvador dali.

What it reported doing in 2024

Sdrc was a co-sponsor for the film series sur-real: fantasy & vision in ibero-american cinema, which was presented as one of the program highlights of the 25th edition of the havana film festival New York. This curated program of six films + free panel discussion explored how ibero-american cinema has been shaped by and further developed salvador dal's artistic legacy as a foundational voice of surrealism, intertwining the fantastical with profound social and historical themes. The screenings and panel discussion took place at the quad cinema from april 4 - april 10, 2025, and was free to the public.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.