Screen Actors Guild Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

80 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

See schedule o

Activities of the conservatory committee provide education in the craft of acting, in the form of seminars, workshops, lectures, etc.

Revenue model: Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Operating margin: -5.1%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -72.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 71 of 71 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments
Leadership: top reported pay $594K · 80 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed
Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
Filing history: 3 filing years from 2009 to 2011
Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.