Scott County Farm Bureau

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 370664130
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2013–2017
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2017
Location: Pittsfield, IL, USA
Phone: 2177423351
Rating: 39
Verdict: REVIEW
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Farm Bureau, Grange

Reported finances

Revenue: $71,501
Expenses: $79,493
Assets: $0
Liabilities: $0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

WAYNE BROWN (PRESIDENT)
JEFF HURRELBRINK (VICE-PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

WILL ANDRAS (DIRECTOR)
WAYNE BROWN (PRESIDENT)
BEN COON (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve the economic well-being of agriculture and enrich the quality of farm family life.

What it reported doing in 2017

Information publication - to provide a monthly publication with agricultural related information to the membership. Circulation of publication is to the membership of approximately 493. Plat book sales - to provide county plat books to residents of the county.

Operating model

Revenue model: Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model: Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 6
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 20
Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 9.8%; rating input score 10
Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: -11.2%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -25.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 9.8% of revenue deployed
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
Schedules: 2 filed schedules
Filing history: 5 filing years from 2013 to 2017
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.