Scooters Pals

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262503238
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2008
Location
Cedar Ridge, CA, USA
Phone
5303502099
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Reported finances

Revenue
$198,958
Expenses
$181,219
Assets
$578,933
Liabilities
$160,138

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Susan Wallace (Founder)
  • Janet Naef (Treasurer)
  • Marilyn Brandfass (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide within available resources safe, caring, and healthy living situations for neglected, abused, abandoned and otherwise homeless animals in the greater Nevada City/Grass Valley area and surrounding counties, including Sacramento County and throughout northern California.

What it reported doing in 2024

Scooter's Pals continues to be committed to be an all volunteer no paid staff rescue where all our resources go to the animals care.The collective impact of the pandemic has taken a substantial toll on our efforts and impacted our available resources both financial and with our volunteer base.Our inability to gather and meet in person has diminished our impact to our mission in subtle but substantial ways. Fund-raising has slowly lessened. And some expenses that can't be avoided such as vet services has increased. It has forced us to be more creative and driven to continue to aide abandoned dogs and cats to the extent our resources allow. We have had more call to assist dogs from the community to find new hones to avoid them going to shelters.Helping the displaced fire victims find temporary and in some instances permanent re-homes has been an increased need we meet to the extent possible. Social networking has been enormously helpful to us in these efforts. We have been forced by necessity to meet the community's changing needs. We are proud of our resourcefulness and how we have adapted to the changing world around us. Our devotion to abandoned animals and our community's animals in need drive our commitment to meet these needs. We still rescue as many dogs as we can find fosters and homes for and we continue to follow our safety and in-house procedures that protect the animals we help assist to stay alive and find good homes. We still take all our returned dogs back and either re-home them or place them in a safe Sanctuary setting for their remaining lifetime if they are not terminal but also not easily re-homed. Our focus is committed to the animals that are increasingly vulnerable to changes in a world they have no control over.Our mission has not changed and we put the safety concerns for the animals we help as our priority.We continue to share with other groups when we have excess food and goods for their animals. We constantly learn and grow and do our best for these animals in need.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.5%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 87.3%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $74.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.9%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.19; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.5% of revenue deployed · 87.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $158K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.