Scm&k Enterprises Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271771864
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- El Cajon, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8582053817
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $52,987
- Expenses
- $52,354
- Assets
- $11,258
- Liabilities
- $14,268
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- Steele Sacks (Treasurer)
- Catherine Sacks (Secretary)
- Evadne Pina (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The specific charitable purposes for which this corporation has been organized are to include:1. Rescuing animals from life threatening situations at animal shelters and elsewhere.2. Finding animals permanent loving homes with qualified owners.3. Providing refuge for stray, abandoned, lost or injured animals.4. To place adoptable pets in permanent homes.5. To educate the public about animal welfare and the advantages of adopting pets from shelters and rescue organizations. 6. To promote awareness on the importance of having pets spayed or neutered.
What it reported doing in 2025
SCM&K continued to achieve the overall mission of the charity. During the year animals were rescuedfrom life threatening situations at animal shelters and elsewhere. In addition many animals found permanent loving homes with qualified owners. SCM&K continued to provide refuge for stray, abandoned, lost or injured animals, to place adoptable pets in permanent homes. They also continued to educate the public about animal welfare and the advantages of adopting pets from shelters and rescue organizations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.2%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.27; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.3% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.