Scientific Network on Female Sexual Health and Cancer Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473945687
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Burnsville, MN, USA
- Phone
- 9526831878
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $98,730
- Expenses
- $89,789
- Assets
- $146,922
- Liabilities
- $15,979
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Tessa Benitez (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Tessa Benitez (Executive Director)
- Jennifer Reese PhD (Chair)
- Carol Kuhle DO MPH (Chair Elect)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Scientific Network on Female Sexual Health and Cancer is a global interdisciplinary network of clinicians, researchers, and healthcare professionals. The Scientific Network works to promote sexual well-being in women and girls affected by cancer by advancing evidence-based education and practices.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Scientific Network on Female Sexual Health and Cancer conducts a conference every 18 months and includes abstract presentations, poster sessions, and symposia with invited speakers. The meeting serves as a forum for scientific and clinical discussions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 59.4%; rating input score 59
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.1%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.64; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 54% of revenue deployed · 59.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $53K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.