Science & Technology Education Project
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850891983
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Oak Ridge, NC, USA
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $165,750
- Expenses
- $22,235
- Assets
- $215,500
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ahmad Chaudhry (President)
- Akir Khan (Vice-President)
- Amjad Chaudhry (Vice-President)
People named in this filing
- Ahmad Chaudhry (President)
- Akir Khan (Vice-President)
- Amjad Chaudhry (Vice-President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organizations mission is to empower students in charity schools by providing access to cutting-edge education technology including tablets computers and robust learning management systems LMS with interactive lessons. We further enhance this impact by training teachers in the effective use of these tools fostering an engaging learning environment and equipping students with the skills necessary to excel academically and thrive in a digital world.
What it reported doing in 2024
Computer Lab setup: The organization donated 20 computers to set up a computer Lab in a charity school managed by a nonprofit in Pakistan Hope Uplift Foundation. An online LMS Learning Management System with interactive lessons was also provided to this school so that the teachers and students can benefit from Education Technology. More than 500 students who belong to low-income families have benefited from our donations to this school.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 37
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 92
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 10.8%; rating input score 11
- Program expense ratio: 80.4%; rating input score 80
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 86.6%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.69; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 10.8% of revenue deployed · 80.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $18K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.