Schuylkill Rehabilitation Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232440891
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2022
Location
Allentown, PA, USA
Phone
4842241876
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Rehabilitative Medical Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,617,305
Expenses
$1,390,858
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • THOMAS J MARCHOZZI MBA CPA (ASSISTANT TREASURER/TRUSTEE): $1,445,107 total reported compensation
  • WILLIAM J REPPY (SECRETARY/TREASURER/TRUSTEE): $395,770 total reported compensation
  • KELLY S SHAK (VP, REHABILITATION SERVICES): $283,381 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide rehabilitation medicine services focusing on the whole person to meet the needs of those in the community who have experienced disabling injury or illness; to include patient and family in planning the goal oriented interdisciplinary program; to provide a nurturing climate for the personal and professional growth of staff; to maintain financial viability.

What it reported doing in 2022

Lehigh valley health network (lvhn) rehabilitation center - schuylkill brings together a full range of services in a team approach to treat neurological and orthopedic disorders. Our experienced team is committed to providing quality rehabilitation. State-of-the art facilities and equipment allow this dedicated team to focus on results. Services include physical, occupational and speech therapy with specialty programs of orthopedics, neurological, aquatics, hand therapy, lymphedema management, cancer rehabilitation, vestibular rehabilitation, and a work conditioning program, as well as support of social services. In fy23, there were 22,635 rehab visits completed at the rehabilitation center, with 6-day access at 98.6 exceeding lvhn network goal level of 96.8. Within the nrc system (patient satisfaction system) for fy23 net promoter score was 92.6 which exceeded network goal of for op rehab at 92.5 as well as "would recommend facility "scored at 91.3 exceeding benchmark of 87.4 and ease to obtain an appointment at 63.9 which exceeded benchmark of 57.2.the programming and staff at the rehab center are committed to the community in providing education and support. In fy23 the staff at lvhn-rehabilitation center schuylkill provided preventative information related to safety, ergonomics and body mechanics for osha staff through a virtual presentation and hands on training for project search interns at lvh-schuylkill. Community events with representation of lvhn rehabilitation center - schuylkill staff included involvement at community heritage days in orwigsburg, schuylkill haven, and tamaqua; an autism event; diakon senior services fair and yuengling's logger jogger run in pottsville. Staff also participated in local employer (tredegar) safety day. Staff at the rehabilitation center also provides opportunities for students through the lehigh valley hospital - schuylkill nursing program, and for high school students with the emerging health student program, with observation and patient engagement on-site over a three-month period for each. Clinicians also supported college level physical and occupational therapy students gain experience and required hours through clinical fieldwork/externships.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 60
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.8%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 10 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 51 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.