School of Management Alumni Association State University of Ny at Buffalo
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222328457
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Buffalo, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7166453224
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alumni Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $95,712
- Expenses
- $94,404
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUDHA BOMMIDI (PRESIDENT)
- JAMES D MACRI (VICE PRESIDENT - BOARD ENGAGEMENT)
- CHRISTOPHER EGLIN (VICE PRESIDENT- PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT)
- MATTHEW HALICKI (VICE PRESIDENT - FACULTY RELATIONS)
- DAVID READING (VICE PRESIDENT - STUDENT RELATION)
- ANDREW PEER (VICE PRESIDENT - NOMINATIONS)
People named in this filing
- SUDHA BOMMIDI (PRESIDENT)
- JAMES D MACRI (VICE PRESIDENT - BOARD ENGAGEMENT)
- JULIA JORNSAY-SILVERBERG (ASSISTANT VP - BOARD ENGAGEMENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the university at buffalo school of management alumni association is to promote, enhance and support the welfare and the educational interests of the university at buffalo school of management (the "school") in the academic and business community by fostering engagement, communication and support among alumni, the school and the university at buffalo.
What it reported doing in 2023
Events and other programming for the benefit of current students, alumni and general public.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 73% for direct work, and 27% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.1%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 69%; rating input score 69
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.4%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.3% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.1% of revenue deployed · 69% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $65K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.