School of Healing Arts

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
330422032
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2010
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2010
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Phone
8589265845
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Vocational, Technical Schools

Reported finances

Revenue
$73,602
Expenses
$70,132
Assets
$12,730

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The School of Healing Arts provides unique holistic services and programs unavailable or inaccessible in local, state or government programs that are of public benefit to senior citizens, people of low income and people with special health needs. Education and services are centered around integrating traditional Eastern Asian holistic methods for practical use in modern Western society. Services, classes and vocational training is also available to the general public. Volunteers provide facilitation of services and education. Participants (10-100 week) received services in non-medical nutrition, exercise, shiatsu and western massage and health and lifestyle recommendations.

What it reported doing in 2010

Holistic Health Services and education unavailable or inaccessible in local state or government programs that are of public benefit to senior citizens, people of low income and people with special health needs. Services and education integrate Eastern Asian Holistic methods for use in modern day society. 10-100 participants are served weekly.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.7%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $74K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.