School of Choice Education Organization
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454277736
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Chicago, IL, USA
- Phone
- 3124939929
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $352,015
- Expenses
- $450,740
- Assets
- $1,637,050
- Liabilities
- $7,865
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LAURA P HARTMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- IONE CASSENS (CAMPUS DIRECTOR): $114,934 total reported compensation
- LAURA P HARTMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $114,583 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To partner with haitians to develop and educate haitian youth to lead their communities, haiti, and the world.
What it reported doing in 2024
The school of choice of education organization supported the activities of l'ecole de choix (an elementary school in haiti), by providing grants for operating expenses. The board of school of choice education organization evaluates the needs of the school and provides grants to meet those needs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 91% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.9%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 62.7%; rating input score 63
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.4%; rating input score 98; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -28%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.63; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 50.9%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.9% of revenue deployed · 62.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $283K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $115K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.