School Nutrition Association of Sd Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453943905
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Pierre, SD, USA
Phone
6052801604
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$64,519
Expenses
$89,201
Assets
$128,944

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NICOLE DENNIS (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • ANDREA KRUSE (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • RITA WALTER (President)
  • AMBER FOSTER (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • KATIE SIEVERDING (Executive Dir.)
  • AMANDA REILLY (Secretary/Treas)
  • NICOLE DENNIS (PAST PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

School nutrition association of South Dakota (snasd) is dedicated to being recognized experts, who advocate the link between nutrition, health, and education. Together, we are making the right food choices for our students. 1) providing members and non-members in school foodservice with education and training. 2) setting standards through certification and credentialing. 3) gathering and transmitting regulatory, legislating, industry, nutritional and other types of information related to school nutrition.

What it reported doing in 2025

School nutrition association of South Dakota, inc. Works to ensure all children have access to healthful school meals and nutrition education by providing members and non-members in school food service with education and training. The nutritional interests of all children are represented by promoting the establishment of nutrition policy and legislation that provides optimal nutrition and nutrition education for children.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -38.3%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.45; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $89K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.