School Nutrition Association of Pennsylvania
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251147587
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021
- Location
- Winchester, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7177321100
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $257,047
- Expenses
- $137,148
- Assets
- $591,358
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DIMITRA BARRIOS (PRESIDENT)
- MEGAN SCHAPER (PRESIDENT EL)
People named in this filing
- DIMITRA BARRIOS (PRESIDENT)
- NICOLE BERRIER (BOARD MEMBER)
- JASON BLOCK (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To positively impact the wellness of children through healthy school meals and high quality child nutrition programs.
What it reported doing in 2021
Snapa sponsors, conducts and promotes local, regional, state and national conferences and seminars to disseminate information regarding child nutrition and developments in school meal programs. Vendor exhibits support professional education regarding developments and product availability.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 76% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some related-organization disclosures are missing.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41.6%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 78%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46.6%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.31; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 41.6% of revenue deployed · 78% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $107K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2013 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.