School Health Clinics of Santa Clara County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770031679
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Jose, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4082824340
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,955,744
- Expenses
- $9,178,427
- Assets
- $11,547,823
- Liabilities
- $3,330,391
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHANIE KLEINHEINZ (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- STEPHANIE KLEINHEINZ (CEO): $332,869 total reported compensation
- JOCELYN HART (COO/CFO): $331,626 total reported compensation
- CLEMENTE CASUGA (IT DIRECTOR): $195,954 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
School health clinics of santa clara county is committed to keeping kids healthy and in school by providing high quality, easily accessible primary medical care and preventive health services to low-income families, serving patients of all ages.
What it reported doing in 2024
School health clinics of santa clara county (shc) is a nonprofit organization that operates federally qualified health centers (fqhc) that are entirely school-based. Shc provides high-quality, easily accessible primary medical care and preventive health services to low income children and adolescents. Under the governance of its board of directors, the organization provides the following services: preventative care (including physical examinations and immunizations), urgent care, chronic disease management, treatment of illness and injuries, comprehensive adolescent services, behavioral health support, dental screenings, and referrals to specialty care. During the year ended june 30, 2025, the organization continued to strive to provide high-quality, affordable health care to low income families in santa clara county. School health clinics provided 16,980 healthcare visits to 4,978 patients across all five school health clinics sites. In may 2025, the organization's administrative staff participated in an operational site visit (osv) conducted bythe health services and resources administration (hrsa). The purpose of the osv is to "provide an objectiveassessment that verifies a health center's compliance with the statutory and regulatory requirements of the healthcenter program" (bureau of primary health care, 2026). The osv was completed with no findings.towards the end of the 2025 fiscal year, the organization began planning to implement dental services in the clinics.the addition of dental services was a high priority for patients when asked for additional services. This will alsoallow the organization to request a pps rate review once the services are implemented.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 63% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.6%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 83.6%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.8%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.26; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.1%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.6% of revenue deployed · 83.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $333K · 22 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $108K reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 58/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.