School for Advanced Research

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
850125045
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Santa Fe, NM, USA
Phone
5059547200
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Anthropology, Sociology

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,784,057
Expenses
$5,589,822
Assets
$48,027,385
Liabilities
$327,993

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

35 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL F BROWN (PRESIDENT EM)
  • DR MORRIS W FOSTER (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHAEL F BROWN (PRESIDENT EM): $255,525 total reported compensation
  • DR ESTEVAN RAEL-GALVEZ (DIRECTOR): $150,000 total reported compensation
  • DR MORRIS W FOSTER (PRESIDENT): $147,135 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The school for advanced research's mission is to advance understanding of humanity through a unique alchemy of creative practice and scholarly research in native american arts, anthropology, and related disciplines. Its vision is to be a nexus of scholars and artists, creative thinkers and curious learners, where we exchange ideas, bring life to history, explore the present, and broaden perspectives in pursuit of a more informed and equitable society.

What it reported doing in 2024

The indian arts research center (iarc): the iarc's work this year reinforced the power of orienting collections care around community. The indigenous collections care (icc) guide, a project born from a growing interest in prioritizing and privileging indigenized practices on all levels of museum work, particularly in the stewardship of collections, progressed to the final vetting stage this year, offering opportunities to engage tribal and museum voices across the field. This eventual companion to the widely used guidelines for collaboration and standards for museums with native american collections, illustrates a clear aim for the iarc's continued work: center stewardship around indigenous knowledge and needs, and make that standard practice accessible to professionals and community members around the world. On the public stage, grounded in clay: the spirit of pueblo pottery continued its national tour, following a celebrated New York presentation by the metropolitan museum of art and the vilcek foundation with an opening at the museum of fine arts, houston (october 2024-january 2025) and a run at the saint louis art museum (march- september 2025). The exhibition's curriculum and podcast launched alongside, extending learning to classrooms and homes. The exhibition received a listing as one of the top ten of the year by art forum. The work of native artist fellows at sar this year (kevin aspaas, lynda teller pete, and sheridan macknight) pushed the boundaries of "tradition," challenged how we understand american art, and demonstrated how communities can more actively utilize collections. All three highlighted the indelible connection between art, culture, and language. And, like our scholar alumni, our artist fellows continue to prove that time here at sar can be transformative in ways that inspire continued creative paths, ones that lead to national and global recognition. This year, 2008 ronald and susan dubin fellow jeffrey gibson represented the united states at the venice biennale, as just one such example.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55.2%; rating input score 55
  • Program expense ratio: 63.6%; rating input score 64
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.9 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 36.4%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.59; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.8%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 55.2% of revenue deployed · 63.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 31 of 31 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $256K · 35 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $254K reported
  • Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.