School Connect Sa
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 882742211
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- San Antonio, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2108448184
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $117,052
- Expenses
- $127,170
- Assets
- $65,790
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- MARGARET JUDSON (Chair/Exec Dir)
- LUCAS BARRIENTES (Vice Chair)
- DOSELY ANTONGIORGI (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
School Connect SA is advancing sustainable community transformation by helping the local community serve our local schools in a self-sustaining manner.
What it reported doing in 2024
1.School Connect SA trained 100 school administrators Family Engagement Specialists and champions from five San Antonio school districts; engaged over 300 community partners via our Community and Family Engagement (CAFE) events. 2. Organized a Love Our School Day event that involved over 200 parents and community partners working together on school improvements campus-wide. 3. Trained 50 Facilitators in the Raising Highly Capable Kids curriculum in a series of workshops. 4. Provided caps and gowns for 150 parents who completed the 10 week Raising Highly Capable Kids course.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.3%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 78.5%; rating input score 79
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.6%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 59%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -26% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 101.6% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.3% of revenue deployed · 78.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $100K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.