Sc Podiatric Medical Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 570658155
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Lexington, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8033092400
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $148,719
- Expenses
- $136,241
- Assets
- $50,971
- Liabilities
- $19,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR DAVID SOMERS DPM (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DR DAVID SOMERS DPM (PRESIDENT)
- DR HEATHER DRIESSEN DPM (VICE PRESIDE)
- DR SABINA ABBASOVA DPM (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the scpma is to promote and pursue excellence in all aspects of the art and science of podiatric medicine; to promote appreciation for the excellence on the part of patients, policy makers, other health care professional, third-party payers and the general public; to seek conditions and environments which support optimal practice and patient care; to continually seek and provide additional useful services for its membership; to keep its members informed about any and all changes in regulations, legislation and other areas that may affect the podiatric medical practice in South Carolina; and to unite with similar podiatric medical associations in other states to form the american podiatric medical association, inc.
What it reported doing in 2024
Held board meetings to monitor and identify issues of interst to members and publishing newsletters to keep membership informed.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.4%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.37; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 33.4%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.