Sc Conservation Districts Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 570643134
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Easley, SC, USA
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $70,730
- Expenses
- $41,332
- Assets
- $293,684
- Liabilities
- $34,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
People named in this filing
- AMANDA BAUKNIGHT (TREASURER)
- STERLING W SADLER (CHAIRMAN)
- MARC CRIBB (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Environmental conservation
What it reported doing in 2023
Sc youth workshops - programs held annually to host young students from sc in an attempt to further their knowledge of environmental conservation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 26
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 19.5%; rating input score 19
- Program expense ratio: 36.9%; rating input score 37
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 41.6%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.11; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.4% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 19.5% of revenue deployed · 36.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 19/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.