Sc Bluejays
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 993767662
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Simpsonville, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8643606290
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $1,150
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Christopher Eubanks (President)
People named in this filing
- Kristin Abernathy (Director)
- John Paul Abernathy (Secretary)
- Christopher Eubanks (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
SC Bluejays Inc is a non-profit organization dedicated to enriching the lives of young men and women in our local communities. We utilize basketball as a tool to shape their lives, promoting valuable life skills, education, and character development. Our travel basketball team and youth mentoring enrichment programs provide a safe, supportive environment for underprivileged kids and youth from all walks of life. Many talented young athletes in our community face significant barriers to participating in travel basketball programs. The costs associated with travel, accommodations, and tournament fees are prohibitively expensive for low-income families. As a result, these young athletes miss out on invaluable opportunities for growth, development, and exposure to college scouts and recruiters. 1. Transportation (flights, buses, etc.) 2. Accommodations (hotels, etc.) 3. Tournament fees 4. Meals and incidentals
What it reported doing in 2024
Tournament fees
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 9 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.