Say Ah Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208663409
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6462368517
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $51,247
- Expenses
- $36,265
- Assets
- $66,161
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DEREK McCRACKEN (President)
- ARAFAT OMIRIDAN (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- ANNA J ALLEN (Executive Dir.)
- HELENE EISMAN FISHER (Director)
- LISA BELLUCCI (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve health by improving health literacy.
What it reported doing in 2024
Say Ah! In the Community - Pandemic Reflections (NYC) & Empowering Patients & Caregivers (NYC): Say Ah! collaborated with subject matter experts and community partners to develop trauma informed and health literate writing workshops focused on the COVID19 Pandemic then delivered these workshops to partner sites in Rockland and Westchester, New York, Counties, including Meals on Wheels Rockland, VISIONS, and Hudson Valley Writers Center. Say Ah! delivered health literacy workshops to educate and empower patients, caregivers and community members at host sites across NYC, including SAGE, Hudson Guild, Encore Community Center, Project Find, Catholic Guardian Services. Topics included: Patient 101: Tips to be a More Empowered Patient, How to Find Reliable Health Information Online; and ER 101: How to Plan and Prepare for a Medical Emergency, and more. $20,000.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.2%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.82; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.1% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.