Saving All Children Dba Family Healing Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611548570
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Fresno, CA, USA
Phone
5598401012
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Child Day Care

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$444,706
Expenses
$422,731
Assets
$63,229
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • DENISE WYATT (Executive Dir.): $47,400 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The vision of family healing center is that all women and children who are victims of sexual abuse, severe physical abuse, and those who have witnessed abuse, will be treated sensitively by police, prosecution, and protection agencies working harmoniously through the professionals at the center. It is our vision through the center that we treat victims'immediate, emotional, physical, and spiritual need. In addition, the center will provide educational programs and activities to increase awareness and understanding of sexual abuse and domestic violence.

What it reported doing in 2024

The center conducted forensic exams and mdic interviews. There were also visits to the center for therapy. These victims of sexual assault or domestic violence received safe, loving & compassionate care during the year. If necessary, victims received no-cost forensic medical exams performed by a for-profit company with an examination room in the center. The forensic company contracts directly with law enforcement agencies to cover the cost of the exams to provide them evidence of a crime. This benefits victims by allowing them to receive services at one place and avoid waiting in a public medical facility to be examined. This benefits law enforcement agencies by avoiding long wait times at a public medical facility for the victim to be seen. At the center, law enforcement officers have a dedicated space to work, with internet access and refreshments, while waiting for the victim to receive care.a conference room is provided for law enforcement to observe the forensic interview displayed on a large screen monitor and captured on video. Law enforcement officers are able to interact with the interviewer as the interview takes place.new clothing is provided to victims if their clothing is needed for evidence. Fleece blankets donated by volunteers from fresno christian schools were given to victims who needed comfort. Stuffed animals donated by volunteers were also given to children. Forensic interviews were provided by trained, compassionate professionals.therapeutic/mental health interventions are available for children and families at no cost.civil legal support services are available to victims at no cost.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.9%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.2%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 81% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $360K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $47K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.