Save Us Pets Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
061676248
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Shrewsbury, NJ, USA
Phone
7328591454
Rating
95
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$44,762
Expenses
$136,422
Assets
$129,950

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • CAROL OLEA (Secretary)
  • JOAN GRADO (Treasurer)
  • EDWIN ORTIZ (Executive Dir.)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The foundation's primary purpose is to promote the general welfare of domestic animals.it is dedicated to ensure that no pet is denied medical treatment because of its owner's inability to pay. The foundation makes grants based on requests for medical treatment of pets as submitted by participating veterinarians.

What it reported doing in 2024

During 2018, the foundation joined a nationwide network association that helps create relationsips with numerous philanthropists and non-profit organizations in the hopes of broadening the outreach of support that will enable the goals of the foundation to be realized.in 2024, the foundation awarded grants totaling $128,933 to help pets in need of medical treatment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 94.5%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -204.8%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $129K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.