Save the Lampasas River Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383801620
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 7132765704
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Water Resource, Wetlands Conservation and Management
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $2,616
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- NED EWART (DIRECTOR)
- LYNN EYBERG (DIRECTOR PRE)
- DOUG EYBERG (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Save the lampasas river, inc. ("stlr") was formed in june 2009 to promote the conservation of environmental, wildlife, riparian, water, water quality, aesthetic and recreational aspects of the lampasas river and the lampasas river valley. The area of particular focus is an approximately 50 mile long swath in various parts of lampasas, burnet and bell counties, Texas from the lampasas, Texas area to the stillhouse hollow reservoir area southeast of killeen, Texas. This area is surrounded by a particularly high population growth area, with the principal cities being lampasas, copperas cove, harker heights and killeen, with a population exceeding 200,000. The lampasas river runs to the north of lampasas and to the south of these other population areas. This portion of the lampasas river valley has been able to retain its undeveloped, rural beauty in the midst of surrounding growth and is recognized for its wildlife, aesthetic and recreational attributes. The lampasas river valley in this
What it reported doing in 2024
Stlr's efforts to protect the lampasas river valley were originally focused on a number of challenges to the river valley: degradation of the river environment, water quality and silting adverse impacts to the numerous spring-fed streams in the area destruction and fragmentation of irreplaceable wildlife habitat including the identified "endangered", "threatened- and "monitored" species
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: NotEnoughData
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: -40% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.