Save the Bee

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
882062693
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Eugene, OR, USA
Phone
5416890913
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Wildlife Preservation, Protection

Reported finances

Revenue
$179,596
Expenses
$207,722
Assets
$181,720
Liabilities
$326,447

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CATIE COMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • ERIC MASON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • ALAN D TURANSKI (CHAIR & DIRECTOR)
  • DEWEY CARON (SECRETARY & DIRECTOR)
  • DARCEY HOWARD (TREASURER & DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Save the bee works to protect honey bee health by increasing awareness of the critical role honey bees play in our food supply; funding scientific research regarding the causes of declining bee populations and solutions to enhance bee colony health; providing education for beekeepers and farmers; creating pollinator habitat; and supporting pesticide reform.

What it reported doing in 2024

1. Pollinator habitat development: objective: the goal of the multi-year save the bee x pollinator partnership project is to increase pollinator nesting habitat and forage resources across diverse u.s. Farms. Through habitat types such as between-row seeding, hedgerow installments, designated seeding plots, and nectar stem planting areas, this initiative aims to support pollinator health, improve soil quality, and provide natural pest management (ipm) benefits.accomplishments:- farm partner selection: farms were selected based on their unique environmental needs and potential for meaningful pollinator impact across different u.s. Regions- seed mix/hedge row selection: each farm's seed mix or hedge row was carefully selected for diverse bloom periods and environmental compatibility, considering factors like regional climate, soil health needs, and integrated pest management (ipm) services.- total area planted and maintained: approximately 1 million square feet across all participating farms and locations.locations and contributions: halbrendt winery, orrtanna, pa 2.5 acresrose cottage llc, meridian, id 17 acres (additional 50 acres with recipient funding)abbey road farm, carlton, or 24,150 sq ftflip flop farm, pescadero, ca 4,915 sq ft (spring planting) with 18,800 sq ft planted in fallsengle's mountainhome blueberry farm, julian, pa 2,200 sq ftmanulife farm, Washington planning phase, no planted area yetnaches valley school district, naches, wa, 4000 sq ftthe save the bee x pollinator partnership project has initiated and supported the establishment of pollinator-friendly habitats across various u.s. Farms, each tailored to its environmental needs and objectives. This report details each farm's planting specifics and intended ecological benefits:- manulife farm (Washington) is in its initial planning phase, with seeding between orchard rows and hedgerow installations scheduled. Plant selection aims to enrich soil nitrogen and provide continuous forage.- naches valley school districtapproximately 4,000 sq ft. Of hedgerow was prepped in 2024 and planted in spring 2025. The hedgerow planting is intended to provide permanent pollinator nesting and forage habitat, as well as integrative pest management (ipm) services to the orchard. The hedgerow species selected will provide a diversity of plant species across spring, summer, and fall. All species, aside from one (english lavender), are native to the location they will be planted. The following species included in the hedgerow mix are: golden currant, hoary aster, ocean spray, goldenrod, fern bush, english lavender, wild woods rose, hardback spirea, snow buckwheat, common snowberry, yarrow, and blue elderberry. This site also serves as an education and awareness resource and location.- abbey road farm (Oregon) completed habitat installation in march, introducing species such as black hawthorn, bitter cherry, and snowberry to complement existing blooms. The 24,150 sq ft hedgerow enhances mid-season blooms and provides ipm support.- flip flop farm (California) has completed the first phase of planting, covering 4,915 sq ft, with species like yellow bush lupine and hummingbird sage chosen for seasonal bloom diversity. Another 18,800 sq ft is prepared for the fall phase.- rose cottage llc (Idaho) dedicated 17 acres to pollinator habitat using a diverse seed mix aimed at soil health and pollinator forage, with an additional 50 acres funded by the recipient. Plantings contribute both to soil enrichment and seasonal floral resources.- sengle's mountainhome blueberry farm (Pennsylvania) prepared 2,200 sq ft for a wide variety of seasonal plants like California poppy and blackeyed susan, balancing pollinator benefits with soil health.- halbrendt winery (Pennsylvania) dedicated 2.5 acres to seasonal blooms, attracting a variety of pollinators and enhancing local biodiversity. The grower notes both successes and challenges with companion planting techniques, which will inform next year's stra

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 80% for direct work, and 20% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.4%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 59.1%; rating input score 59

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15.7%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.8; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 65.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -26.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.4% of revenue deployed · 59.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $123K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.