Save Our Children Project USA Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
743249194
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Oakland, CA, USA
Phone
5104444300
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$1,586
Assets
$1,671

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Clarence White (President)

People named in this filing

  • Clarence White (President)
  • Janie Young-Chaumette (Treasurer)
  • Joyce V Gordon (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To Develop, or Promote, Programs and Activities That Connect Children Ages 6 - 13 with Individuals and Organization Whose Efforts Foster Positive Adult Interactions Through Educational and Physical Activities That Cultivate Positive Attitudes and Results in/for Our Children.

What it reported doing in 2013

Worked with Joyce Gordon Art Alliance to Expose Low Income and Disadvantaged Children to the Various Art Forms.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 12
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 31.5%; rating input score 32

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -56.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -120% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -57.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 31.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $500 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.