Save Mount Diablo

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942681735
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Walnut Creek, CA, USA
Phone
9259473535
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Parks and Playgrounds

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,026,768
Expenses
$3,953,606
Assets
$29,365,573
Liabilities
$2,037,109

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JIM FELTON (PRESIDENT)
  • GISELLE JURKANIN (VICE PRESIDENT / SECRETARY)
  • EDWARD SORTWELL CLEMENT JR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • EDWARD SORTWELL CLEMENT JR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $209,824 total reported compensation
  • SETH ADAMS (LAND CONSERVATION DIRECTOR): $167,119 total reported compensation
  • MONICA OEI (FINANCE & ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR): $139,336 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Save mount diablo's mission is to preserve mount diablo's peaks, surrounding foothills, and watersheds; and its sustaining diablo range, through land acquisition and preservation strategies designed to protect the mountain's natural beauty, biological diversity, and historic and agricultural heritage; enhance our area's quality of life; and provide educational and recreational opportunities consistent with protection of natural resources.

What it reported doing in 2024

Stewardship: save mount diablo currently owns and/or manages 21 properties totaling 2190-acres. Save mount diablo also holds perpetual conservation easements on 3 properties, totaling 176-acres.- successfully stewarded the thousands of acres under our care (planting native species, removing invasive species, regular property monitoring, etc.).- more than 685 volunteers completed over 5,996 hours of service in the 2024 - 2025 fiscal year. They have supported all our activities across departments throughout the year. Recurrent stewardship volunteers include 28 property monitors and 34 volunteer stewards.- volunteers: our volunteers are the heroes and heroines of land preservation. They help make our work possible, whether it be by helping restore ecological systems, becoming a hike leader, assisting with event registration, staffing aid stations, taking photos, or setting up equipment. Their hard work and generosity are what help make this organization's efforts so successful.- stewards also continued monthly property outings, and organized small workdays for restoration plantings, weeding, mulching, watering native plantings and clean up of our properties.- staff continued monitoring impacts to vegetation in the jackass canyon area, with California state parks and cal fire, working together to thin, chip and manage hazardous fuel load in the area.- with our partners at the lindsay wildlife experience, we continued to release rehabilitated american kestrels into the mount diablo foothills, strengthening wildlife corridors.- advanced our 10,000 trees and native plants project, planting and caring for more than 3,000 plants at our restoration sites, many of those plants being California milkweed and other pollinator plants for monarch foraging, building and strengthening habitat for wildlife.- we monitor and remediate storm damage on all our properties. We installed a solar well and a wildlife trough at mc7 to maintain and strengthen wildlife habitat and water quality in marsh creek. - staff worked with students and volunteers to create a pollinator garden at mc7, and fenced it with cedar split-rail fencing, to protect the area from cattle that graze for fire abatement. This is all in partnership with a grant from cdfw to strengthen wildlife habitat for listed species and improve water quality in marsh creek.- staff led the 4th annual pine canyon clean-up with the mount diablo state park, the east bay regional park district, the american alpine club, and the bay area climbers coalition, where we removed invasive species, graffiti, and trash from the pine canyon area, as well as hazardous fuel load from the aspara drive area with a chipper.- we hosted major clean-up workdays, including a coastal clean-up workday in kirker creek, with the help of a small group of volunteers to remove 10 garbage bags of trash. - on our coastal cleanup day, we removed 3,000 lbs of debris.- in 2025, save mount diablo finished creating and opening more public trails at our curry canyon ranch preserve which means our organization has now created and opened over 7 miles of new public trails, at our curry canyon ranch and mangini ranch educational preserve, in just the last few years.- stewardship staff led 4 environmental education days at curry canyon ranch for mdusd students in the bacr cares program, effectively creating an inspiring workday in the hills.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 50
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 45.9%; rating input score 46
  • Program expense ratio: 63.9%; rating input score 64
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 55%; rating input score 55; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 34.4%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.43; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.3%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 45.9% of revenue deployed · 63.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $210K · 23 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 41 of 43 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 55/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.