Save a Heart Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 953475198
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Heart, Circulatory Research
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $54,381
- Expenses
- $33,021
- Assets
- $174,882
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- YZHAR CHARUZI MD (President)
- SARIT FINKELSTEIN-BOIM (CEO)
People named in this filing
- YZHAR CHARUZI MD (President)
- SARIT FINKELSTEIN-BOIM (CEO)
- SEYMOUR FAGAN ESQ (Executive Dir.)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Save A Heart Foundation SAHF, established in 1980, since then has supported over forty-five gifted Israeli cardiologists mostly trained at CSMC and recently at USC. The SAHF fellows have been extremely industrious and productive researchers and have returned to Israel to assume leadership positions in their respective fields. Save A Heart Foundation has joined forces with both the California Chapter of the American College of Cardiology and the Israel Heart Society. The current goal is to expand research opportunities for Israeli fellows to many prestigious academic cardiology programs in California, including Cedars-Sinai, Stanford University, University of Southern California, and various campuses of the University of California.
What it reported doing in 2024
Research in early prevention, detection and cure of heart disease.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.3%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.3; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.