Savannah Philharmonic Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
264016312
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Savannah, GA, USA
Phone
9122326002
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Symphony Orchestras

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,561,852
Expenses
$2,135,499
Assets
$897,567
Liabilities
$760,333

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAPHNE NASH (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • AMY WILLIAMS (EXECUTIVE DI): $142,556 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To inform, instruct and enrich the community through orchestral performances; and to promote and increase community knowledge and appreciation of the arts.

What it reported doing in 2024

Organizational history: established 2008, the savannah philharmonic orchestra (spo) a 501 (c) 3 has grown to a nearly 1.7 million operating budget, with 5 full-time staff members, 60 contract-and fee-based musicians, 50 volunteer choristers, and 19-member board of directors. Spo has been contributing to the savannah- metropolitan area for nearly a decade through orchestral performances ranging from classics to popular show tunes. Spo has performed in a multitude of locations throughout savannah including, but not limited to, the lucas theatre, cathedral of st. John the baptist, tybee post theatre, johnny mercer theatre, the band shell in historic forsyth park, and area neighborhood community centers. At its largest capacity, spo has played for over 20,000 individuals catering towards an inclusive audience. Since its inception nearly 13 years ago, spo has strengthened the arts and culture in the savannah-metropolitan area through continual work to expand programs offered and adapt to the needs of the community. Outside the concert hall, spo offers a variety of community engagement programs including throughout the community, phil the park, and phil the squares. Each of these programs are free and open to the public offering a fun, family-friendly experience. Spo also takes great pride in their educational programs that take place in partnership with savannah chatham public school system. Mission statement: savannah philharmonic, an innovative and influential arts organization, will entertain, inspire and build community throughout the region. Community: the savannah philharmonic "soundtrack of savannah" is more than simply connecting with our community through music. It's an open invitation to enjoy music with our friends and neighbors while exploring the unique places, flavors, and events of our region. In fy20 the spo was one of few orchestras to perform in the community. Through creative collaboration, venues, and programming the spo provided concerts each month for socially distanced audiences. In addition the spo took the opportunity to understand the neighborhood in which it lives and build a 3 year strategic plan. This plan sets goals for financial sustainability, community engagement, and artistic integrity setting the stage for the spo to be a pillar in the community well into the future. Spo continued to partner with the city of savannah to produce and present picnic in the park - creatively through a partnership with wtoc the concert was broadcast with a viewership of over 20,000.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67.5%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 80.5%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $19.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.6%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.42; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.85; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.7%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67.5% of revenue deployed · 80.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $143K · 19 people listed
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.