Savanda Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
833208714
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Savannah, GA, USA
Phone
9123980430
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities

Reported finances

Revenue
$115,048
Expenses
$100,105
Assets
$90,125
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KYLE MCCANN (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • GERRARD MACLEOD (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • KYLE MCCANN (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • MIKE MCCARTHY (CFO)
  • GERRARD MACLEOD (CEO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve healthcare for pregnant women in low- and lower-middle-income countries by supporting access to quality maternal care, health education, and local healthcare capacity building.

What it reported doing in 2025

Medical infrastructure and clinical training :- savanda prioritizes the development of sustainable hospital infrastructure and local expertise to ensure that patients receive high-quality care upon arrival. In 2025, these efforts were focused on ibanda hospital: neonatal icu (nicu): funding the renovation of a nicu to support premature and critically ill newborns; professional training: sponsoring the education of local specialists to maintain these systems, including pediatrician training for the nicu staff and electrical engineering training to manage the hospital's hybrid solar power and water systems; facility improvements: matintenance and upgrades to the hospital's electrical grid and laboratory facilities to protect sensitive medical equipment from unstable power surges.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.8%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 87.1%; rating input score 87

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 68.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.8% of revenue deployed · 87.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $87K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.