Satellite Beach Flying Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462714340
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Melbourne, FL, USA
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Recreational l Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$107,232
Expenses
$77,854
Assets
$61,662

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jason Natwick (President)
  • Brian Rudloff (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Jason Natwick (President)
  • Brian Rudloff (Vice President)
  • Ryan Gibbons (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Satellite Beach Flying Club is organized to promote aviation-related recreational educational and social activities for its members while operating on a nonprofit basis. Its primary purpose is typically to provide members with affordable access to aircraft flight training opportunities aviation safety education and the encouragement of private pilot skills and responsible aircraft use. The club is not formed to generate profits for owners or shareholders. Instead any income received from dues fees or fundraising is used solely to support the clubs operations including aircraft maintenance insurance hangar costs administrative expenses and member programs. The organization also serves the broader public interest by fostering aviation knowledge supporting youth or community aviation programs promoting flight safety and encouraging interest in general aviation.

What it reported doing in 2025

Safety operated club aircraft 550hours free of any incident or conflict.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 79% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.6%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 27.4%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.6% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $78K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.