Saratoga Volleyball Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 882464623
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Saratoga Springs, NY, USA
- Phone
- 4842641222
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $278,363
- Expenses
- $304,881
- Assets
- $59,930
- Liabilities
- $500
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT BONSALL (PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTINE CAPASSO (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT BONSALL (PRESIDENT): $9,500 total reported compensation
- CHRISTINE CAPASSO (VICE PRESIDENT): $4,100 total reported compensation
- LAURA NICOLELLA (DIRECTOR): $3,400 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Saratoga volleyball club, based out of saratoga springs ny, provides an instructional and competitive environment to develop individual and team skills for junior volleyball players.the club was established in 2019 and is currently comprised of a range of junior girls teams from 12u to 18u with a goal of adding junior boys teams in the future. We are a member of the excelsior empire regional volleyball association of usav volleyball (usav) and we compete in local and non-local tournaments associated with usav, jva, and aau.
What it reported doing in 2025
Youth volleyball instruction and tournament play. Approximately 130 youth participants: saratoga volleyball club, based out of saratoga springs ny, provides an instructional and competitive environment to develop individual and team volleyball skills for both girls and boys junior volleyball players.the club is currently comprised of a range of junior girls teams from 12u to 18u and we're excited to add to our boys' teams this year. We are a member of the excelsior empire volleyball association (xlrva) region of usav volleyball (usav) and we compete in local and non-local tournaments associated with usav, jva, and aau.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 68
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.9%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.5%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.2; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 36.5% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $302K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $10K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.