Saratoga Plan Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 141706013
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Saratoga Springs, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5185875554
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Land Resources Conservation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,199,014
- Expenses
- $2,284,802
- Assets
- $6,712,202
- Liabilities
- $295,758
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROB DAVIES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ROB DAVIES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $128,773 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Saratoga plan stewards and protects farms, forests, and waters of the saratoga region and the southern adirondack foothills - now and forever.
What it reported doing in 2025
Conservation program - plan provides comprehensive services and expertise to communities and individuals in the saratoga county region to permanently conserve significant tracts of farmland, woodlands, wildlife habitats, water resources, and trail linkages. Landscape analysis, conservation and community planning, consultations, educational programs, grant writing, volunteer coordination, local government partnership, technical assistance, project management, and direct and facilitated land protection are elements of plan's conservation services.for some projects, plan directly acquires title to real property for nature preserves, trails, and water resource protection, or facilitates and assists the conveyance of property to another entity such as a town or another conservation organization. Another strategy used to conserve land is the acceptance of conservation easements which restrict uses and limit development on properties which continue to be owned and managed by others, thus ensuring their permanent protection and public benefits. In other scenarios, plan helps landowners and communities identify and develop plans for conservation of their natural resources, facilitating or serving as the agent to help implement and accomplish their mutual conservation goals. Plan serves as an umbrella organization to provide support and coordinate the efforts of hundreds of volunteers working to plan, advance and manage a multi-user trail system throughout saratoga county for recreation and transportation. Over 215 miles of trail have been established to date and progress continues to expand and link them into a network.saratoga plan is a nationally accredited land trust, meeting the highest standards for nonprofit management and transaction practices for land conservation and stewardship projects.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 86.3%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $37.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.6%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.94; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.6%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64% of revenue deployed · 86.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $129K · 21 people listed
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.