Saratoga Care Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 141775218
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019
- Location
- Saratoga Springs, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5185838433
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,760,916
- Expenses
- $2,325,068
- Assets
- $2,703,535
- Liabilities
- $256,934
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Angelo Calbone (President/CEO)
- Meredith Woolford (Executive Director of Foundation)
Highest reported compensation
- Steven Frisch MD (Board Member): $1,207,008 total reported compensation
- Angelo Calbone (President/CEO): $1,160,272 total reported compensation
- Gary Foster (VP & CFO): $433,447 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.
What it reported doing in 2019
The foremost commitment of SCI is to enable its affiliated entity (Saratoga Hospital) to provide superior quality healthcare to the people of our community, regardless of their ability to pay.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 93
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 77.3%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 88.2%; rating input score 88; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -32%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.16; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.4%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 77.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.2M · 19 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 46 of 46 current checks pass
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 16 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.