Sarasota County Croquet Club
Legal name: Sarasota County Croquet Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731707615
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- Venice, FL, US
- Phone
- 941-800-2791
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports Competitions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $149,376
- Expenses
- $143,343
- Assets
- $315,139
- Liabilities
- $-352
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HANS PETERSON (PRESIDENT)
- ELLIE GRIFITH (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- HANS PETERSON (PRESIDENT)
- JACKIE JONES (DIRECTOR)
- JOHN GOLDENER (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote an active, healthy lifestyle for members of the community through croquet, while maintaining a volunteer-run, public club that offers free instruction and supports youth programs.
What it reported doing in 2024
The club's primary exempt purpose is the promotion of the sport of croquet. Sarasota county croquet club (sccc) operates on seven croquet courts that we use 365 days a year, weather permitting, from dawn to dusk. The club provides free coaching and instruction by volunteers to everyone in the club. We give free introductory clinics every tuesday and sunday to which the public is invited at no charge. At these clinics, the club provides all equipment including mallets, balls, clips, etc. In addition to free instruction. Visitors can come two times before they are expected to join.croquet provides a means of exercise for seniors who can no longer participate in more strenuous activities such as tennis or golf. The average age of our membership is over sixty-five and we have active members over ninety. We took a survey and found that many of our members, including somefrom england, came to sarasota county because of our club and courts. Many of our current membershave purchased homes and relocated here. We are the largest public club in the country, in terms of the size of our membership and have some of the best maintained croquet lawns in the country thanks to our outstanding partnership with sarasota county.this fiscal year, in addition to all the scheduled activities happening seven days a week, the club hosted thirteen tournaments, plus four one day competitive events. These included tournaments in three different games that we play, golf croquet, american six wicket, and association laws croquet. There were single and double formats, club championships, national, and international where players from across the united states and foreign countries participated. Tuesdays there are free lessons for non-members as well as members. There are plans to restart sunday free play for the public in november.the club is currently at 260 members and has seven full courts. Four new shade structures were erected this year that are available to all the courts. The planning committee is currently negotiating with venice and sarasota county to replace the antiquated electric system. New lighting and enhanced shade systems are the immediate goals.part of this growth is a growing interest in this sport. But another part of the growth has been the significant increase in the local population. As more people move into the area around our club, there is a growing interest in membership.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.8%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 91%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.2; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 87.8% of revenue deployed · 91% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $130K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.