Sara's Cure Clear Cell Sarcoma Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
825445706
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Charleston, SC, USA
Phone
8438646760
Rating
93
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Cancer Research

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$91,784
Expenses
$104,700
Assets
$51,801

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ANN LOPEZ (MARKETING DI)
  • LENNIE WOODS (EXECUTIVE DI)
  • JILL NEAL (ADMINISTRATI)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The clear cell sarcoma foundation is dedicated to making clear cell sarcoma survivable through education and scientific research. We strive to provide a voice and platform for all patients and caregivers impacted by this rare cancer, empowering them to enact change and work towards a cure.

What it reported doing in 2024

Summary of activities january- our executive director participated in a global webinar hosted by the sarcoma foundation of america to present a private/public partnership called cure drug repurposing collaboratory (cdrc), with the initiative to find existing drugs for rare sarcoma.: co-hosted our largest annual fundraiser in charleston sc. Continued to collaborate with the clinical/research community through monthly meetings with sarc, and the ccs tissue collection dod grant community of stakeholders. February & march teamed up with xcures to create a partnership contract for the purpose of collecting electronic health records on ccs patients, an outgrowth of the cdrc project. These real world results were presented at the annual sarcoma conference to the sarcoma community. Plans for expansion into 2025. April - inaugural meeting with dr. Kevin jones surgical oncologist to plan a first ever ccs symposium in charleston sc. September. This meeting is for the purpose of collecting real world experiences (rwe) from ccs patients through the xcures platform and publishing the data as a consensus of the natural history of ccs. May & june cdrc moves forward through our own funded xcures project. Patient families held fundraisers for ccsf including the society of hope fundraiser and the bob costello ccs golf tournament fundraiser to support the ehr data project. July & august- sarcoma awareness month initiatives were sent to educate the community through our newsletter and social media to get the word out about ccs. Continued data collection/analysis and preparation for the upcoming inaugural symposium. September - held the first annual international ccs patient clinician partnered ccs collaborative symposium. Patients met and shared stories in person and by zoom. The meeting was held virtually for our global community to attend as well. Two new initiatives around radiation therapy and patient data were born and will be programs for the 2025 research at the ccsf. October - we held a ccsf research team retreat to analyze ehr data submission and publish a retrospective study abstract for connective tissue oncology society (ctos) presentation in november. We met daily for collaborative and sometimes difficult work analyzing the data and forming it into charts that will drive clinical decision making based on rwe to help improve treatment outcomes. This retreat was with patient community involvement and is core to our mission. November - our ccs research team traveled to san diego to present first of its kind ccs electronic health record data (ehr).. Met with md anderson clinicians to discuss ccs care, met with sarc and clinicians from msk and royal marsden regarding a 2025 trial for ccs. We were able to give several talks to clinicians and researchers at the poster presentation session. We had small card prints to hand out to the oncologists throughout the annual conference. Our research was very well received and has led to further discussions and partnership opportunities. December - giving tuesday and fundraiser project to raise funds for the purchase of 2 new mouse models needed for the jones lab research off project. We successfully raised the funds needed, dr jones was able to negotiate a discount for us and we didnt have to pay any overhead costs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 62% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -14.1%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.9% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $109K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.