Santa's Kids Inc C/o James Johns
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810901998
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Monroeville, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4128773961
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Gift Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,135
- Expenses
- $19,019
- Assets
- $16,174
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES JOHNS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- WILLIAM HILLGROVE (VICE PRESIDE)
- JAMES JOHNS (PRESIDENT)
- JACQUELINE NAVISH (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Santa's kids inc, a not for profit organization, formed in the state of Pennsylvania, staffed entirely by volunteers, was formed and created to bring joyful christmas memories to the underprivileged children and elderly residents of the eastern suburbs of western Pennsylvania by providing toys, clothes, food and any other needed gifts that they could otherwise not afford. The main goal is to keep christmas alive in the hearts and minds of those same underprivileged children and the elderly. The organization works directly with various other groups in the eastern suburbs including but not limited to the pitcairn community center, the rankin community center, crossroads church in monroeville, pa and the hulton arbors community center. These various organizations help determine the recipients of the gifts.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization was incorporated under the Pennsylvania nonprofit corporation law of 1988 (as amended) exclusively for: charitable, literary, scientific, religious and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986; or the corresponding provisions of any future united states internal revenue law (the "code"); particularly to promote, establish and maintain the orgazization's purpose.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 93% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -44.8%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $19K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.