Santa Rosa Sunrise Rotary Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680339109
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Santa Rosa, CA, USA
Phone
7073768279
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$75,843
Expenses
$45,562
Assets
$405,521
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CYNTHIA GILLESPIE (PRESIDENT)
  • LORRAINE RODRIGUES (PRESIDENT ELECT)

People named in this filing

  • CYNTHIA GILLESPIE (PRESIDENT)
  • LORRAINE RODRIGUES (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • PAUL O'REAR (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide programs, services and scholarships to the local, regional andinternational communities for those in need. Also to promote honesty, integrity and community service among its members.

What it reported doing in 2024

To provide funding and support projects and organizations that are scientific, educational or charitable, and to further the charitable goals of the santa rosa sunrise rotary club. The foundation continues to support the operation of a surgical center in sabalos, nicaragua that serves the medical needs of thousands of residents in the area who would otherwise be without life saving medical care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 62.5%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 93.6%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 39.9%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.9; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 62.5% of revenue deployed · 93.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $43K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.