Santa Rosa Kiwanis Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680452486
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Santa Rosa, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7075290588
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $27,797
- Expenses
- $18,420
- Assets
- $65,064
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Toni Holland (President)
- Catherine Adams (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Toni Holland (President)
- Douglass Braik (Secretary)
- Maribel Featherstone (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Kiwanis International is a global community of clubs, members and partners dedicated to improving the lives of children one community at a time. The Santa Rosa Kiwanis Foundation is committed to serving the children through our efforts to better our community in Sonoma County. Our efforts are directed towards earning funds so that we can assist other community groups directly helping the children reach their goals.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community Service is a focus of the Santa Rosa Kiwanis Foundation. We contribute our efforts and funds to organizations that enhance and enrich the lives of children in Sonoma County. We contributed to the Santa Rosa Youth Symphony, Scouts of America and to Salvation Army activities for families and children. Through our Foundation, we actively promote children's literacy by supporting reading programs with our time and distribution of reading materials to advance children's skills and love of reading.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 25
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 20.6%; rating input score 21
- Program expense ratio: 31.1%; rating input score 31
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.7%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.53; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 172.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 86% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 20.6% of revenue deployed · 31.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.