Santa Rosa Area Squad Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473766145
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Rohnert Park, CA, USA
Rating
51
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$27,020
Expenses
$0
Assets
$56,990

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Matt Pinhiero (President)
  • Boone Bathe (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Matt Pinhiero (President)
  • Boone Bathe (Vice President)
  • Dave deRutte (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To a assist local charities; bpromote the social welfare; c promote community outreach programs; d encourage the health and wellness of the community by lessening neighborhood tensions eliminating prejudice and discrimination and combating community deterioration and juvenile delinquency; e maintain and encourage the practice of fairness and equality to all; f encourage efficiency faithfulness and understanding particularly towards the state of california the department of the california highway patrol and the santa rosa area; g stimulate stronger and closer cooperation between the personnel uniformed and nonuniformedof the california highway patrol and others in the performance of their respective duties; h operate lease and grant rights to others in connection with any activity that is engaged in for the exclusive purpose of furthering the objects and purposes set forth herein; j engage in fundraising projects so as to raise and obtain money for the exclu

What it reported doing in 2024

Widows and Orphans Fund

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 35
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: NotEnoughData
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55.5%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -48.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -27.4% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 55.5% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $15K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.