Santa Paula Animal Rescue Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454185395
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Santa Paula, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8055258609
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,577,846
- Expenses
- $1,708,241
- Assets
- $450,927
- Liabilities
- $223,333
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TJ CONVERTINO (PRESIDENT)
- JUDIE STEIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TJ CONVERTINO (PRESIDENT)
- JUDIE STEIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ALEXA BODRERO (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To eliminate the unnecessary killing of stray and companion animals in and around santa paula by providing the resources, progressive programs and community education needed to rehabilitate and re-home these animals.
What it reported doing in 2025
Animal care: santa paula animal rescue center inc (sparc) is a "no kill no excuses" shelter; sparc believes every animal has value, and endeavors to save as many lives possible regardless of how broken, injured, unwanted, or abused they may be. To that end, sparc provides a safe space where every animal coming through our doors is given the medical attention, care, and training they need with the ultimate goal of being rehomed. Sparc rescues not only unwanted and homeless animals, but also animals from kill shelters and community surrendered pets. In 2025, we rescued a total of 650 animals, 210 were surrendered family pets, (up from 2024) and 278 strays off the streets. And sparc successfully adopted out 500 dogs, cats, birds and a few rabbits. Sparc paid $100,140 to outside veterinary hospitals for both emergency and standard services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.8%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 73.7%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.3%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.5; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.8% of revenue deployed · 73.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.