Santa Fe Community Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 562491916
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Santa Fe, NM, USA
- Phone
- 6315992450
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Service Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $72,571
- Expenses
- $94,420
- Assets
- $41,272
- Liabilities
- $2,302
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JACK SECKINGTON (President)
- DANIEL CRAIG (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- NANCY MCDONALD (Executive Direc)
- JACK SECKINGTON (President)
- SHAD BYLER (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide food, other services, and be a resource center for the homeless and others in need.
What it reported doing in 2025
Santa fe community services has been helping the homeless, drug users and any other needs that are presented to us for 19 years.we provide counseling, case management and syphilis testing along with syringe exchange and narcan distribution. Narcan saves lives by reversing an opiate overdose using a nasal spray with this life saving drug.sfcs has gone through several changes this year. We have moved to a new space, 1305 llano st. We have also started a new outreach in madrid, we supply training and narcan distribuiton on a weely basis. The community is very supportive, giving us free space. We will be giving a narcan training at their firehouse shortly.we continue with our same staff who are supportive, compassionate and non judgmental. We are open 3 days a week from 10-4 and one day in madrid 12-4.sfcs is a valuable resource in santa fe and madrid.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.7%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 74.3%; rating input score 74
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -30.1%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 36.3%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.7% of revenue deployed · 74.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $70K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.