Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
953003205
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Newhall, CA, USA
Phone
6612541275
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Historical Societies & Historic Preservation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$218,902
Expenses
$276,620
Assets
$1,232,039
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Alan Pollack (President)

People named in this filing

  • Tom Hough (Treasurer)
  • Alan Pollack (President)
  • Cathy Martin (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Mission of the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society is to preserve and share the culture and history of the Santa Clarita Valley.

What it reported doing in 2024

The purpose of the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society is to raise funds for the identification, acquisition, development, restoration, preservation, maintenance, cataloging, and conservation of historical sites, artifacts, and structures within The Santa Clarita Valley. We also organize and sponsor functions that bring these items of historical significance to the public and the public to these items through local tours and functions at The History Center. During this fiscal year, we were able to once again host a community historical tour of the St. Francis Dam National Memorial site, approximately 100 people were taken on a walking tour of the site and learned the history leading up to the demise of the dam. We have continued our ongoing restoration and maintenance program making significant progress on various projects related to our structures.We are continuing the task of cataloging and scanning our hundreds of thousands of images and other artifacts relating to the history of the Santa Clarita Valley with a full time supervising archivist. We continue to receive donations from community members on a regular basis from across the country that we are adding to our collection. This is an ongoing project but we are determined to have digital records of our collection preserved for generations to come.We are marketing and promoting under the name Santa Clarita History Center as a DBA, and are in the process of becoming an accredited museum to be able to open up our historical structures to the public once again as our restoration and maintenance programs allow. We have recently completed the first phase of our transformation to a museum by renovating portions of the interior of the Saugus Train Station which is now open to the public.Please refer to our website at www.scvhs.org for additional information.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 68.7%; rating input score 69
  • Fundraising efficiency: $12.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -26.4%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.45; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 21.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87% of revenue deployed · 68.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $190K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.