Santa Clara Valley Blind Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 941724265
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4082954016
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Eye Diseases, Blindness and Vision Impairments
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $62,057
- Expenses
- $173,264
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ARNOLD CHEW (BOARD PRESIDENT)
- JOHN GLASS (BOARD VICE PRESIDENT)
- JUDITH ARVIDSON (CEO, (THROUGH 9/14/18))
Highest reported compensation
- JUDITH ARVIDSON (CEO, (THROUGH 9/14/18)): $46,268 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To increase the confidence, independence, and quality of life for the blind and visually impaired through educational, recreational, and rehabilitative programs.
What it reported doing in 2018
The organization is committed to increasing independence, confidence, and quality of life for blind and visually impaired individuals through educational, recreational and rehabilitative programs. See schedule o for more detail.a. Rehabilitation services include individualized/group counseling, peer support, in-home assistance, training with a white cane/dog-guide, daily living skills, medicine management, braille instruction, adaptive technology training, resource access, transportation. Adjustment to vision loss support groups: individual counseling and weekly support and peer sharing groups effectively address the depression, isolation, fear, and anger that accompanies the onset and aid individuals in adapting to progressive vision loss.adapted independent living skills: tailored to each client's specific needs. Adapted techniques for cooking, personal hygiene, home chores, financial management, labeling, etc. Orientation and mobility training: 1:1 training to use a white cane and public transportation. Teaches the skills and confidence to travel safely and independently.access technology training and equipment: instruction in magnification & lighting techniques that enable those with low vision to read newspapers, prescriptions, bills, recipes, tv listings etc. More advanced solutions, are taught when greater magnification or text-to-speech synthesis is needed. Some equipment is available for loan.b. Education services include community outreach, educational meetings, and information and referral. Addresses the strong need that clients express for socialization with their peers, an important element in helping overcome anger and fear as they adjust to losing their sight. Clients learn from, and are inspired by one another, develop social connections, and improve their quality of life. Vision loss counselor-teachers provide the community with information about vision loss, explain our services, train care providers, and participate in health/services fairs. Support for family/friends of the blind is also available.the center maintains an ongoing collection of informational materials and a database of resources to address the broad range of concerns of individuals, and families regarding vision loss. Because access to any information is difficult for the blind, we also collect information on community services, discount programs, food programs, legal aid, housing, disability rights, health services, etc. And render it accessible. Clients can call for information, get information at the weekly client meeting, and/or access information in our reading room/resource library, where they have free use of adapted reading devices and can read or get copies of materials. The weekly client meeting is also a forum through which other service providers may speak to our clients or dispense information. All new clients are given a resource list and a list of free services.opportunities for the blind are also featured in inspirational media.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 55.1%; rating input score 55
- Fundraising efficiency: $25.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -179.2%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 26.7%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -15.5% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -17.4% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -19.5% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 55.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $95K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $46K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2012 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.