Santa Clara County Dental Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 202396440
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- San Jose, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4082891480
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,332
- Expenses
- $21,138
- Assets
- $85,778
- Liabilities
- $1,485
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- John Pisacane DMD (President)
- Kenneth Wallis DDS (Vice President)
- Shadi Kanaan (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- John Pisacane DMD (President)
- Kenneth Wallis DDS (Vice President)
- Mike Forst CDT (Secretary/Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote of all types of education, service and research in the field of dentistry, the ultimate aim of which is to promote improved oral health among the population at large.
What it reported doing in 2024
The santa clara county dental foundation (sccdf) is dedicated to promoting improved oral health for santa clara county residents. We do this by providing resources and funding for programs operated by volunteer dentists from the santaclara county dental society. Sccdf aims to provide free dental care to veterans, homeless people and other selected patients, scholarships to students applying to dental auxiliary schools, and performing dental screenings in local schools. The santa clara county dental foundation hosts and participates in fund-raising events. Sccdf also partners with community leaders and service organizations to give hundreds of deserving individuals access to restorative dental care and oral health services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 88% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 46
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 49.4%; rating input score 49
- Program expense ratio: 40.5%; rating input score 40
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -22%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.06; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 49.4% of revenue deployed · 40.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.