Sutter Health
Legal name: Sansum Clinic
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 956419205
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Sacramento, CA, USA
- Phone
- 800-4SUTTER
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $404,749,549
- Expenses
- $432,094,079
- Assets
- $255,116,228
- Liabilities
- $136,399,083
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
32 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kurt Ransohoff (President, Central Coast Div)
- Chad Hine (CEO Amb., Central Coast Div.)
Highest reported compensation
- Mark Sevco (SVP, COO / Asst. Sec.): $3,655,805 total reported compensation
- Todd Smith MD (SH SVP,Chf Physician Exec/Pres): $1,878,769 total reported compensation
- RAJU IYER (SH SVP, CFO (PT-YR)): $1,311,542 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We enhance the well-being of people in the communities we serve through a not-for-profit commitment to compassion and excellence in healthcare services.
What it reported doing in 2024
In furtherance of its charitable purpose, the clinic provides medical care without charge or at reduced charge to residents of the community, primarily through: (a) services provided at no charge to the uninsured; (b) the difference between public program payments (primarily medical) and the related costs of providing such services; and (c) the services provided to patients expressing a willingness to pay but who are unable due to socio-economic factors. Additional activities undertaken to benefit the community and to fulfill its mission of providing high quality healthcare to every patient in an environment that fosters caring and compassion and promotes education and research include the following: - providing free eye examinations through see international to children who could not otherwise afford them. - providing more than 300 health education classes (e.g. Asthma, back and neck care, cholesterol, diabetes, healthy aging, joint replacement, stress, weight management for children and adults) that are offered each year. The classes are open to the community, are offered for free or at a nominal fee and are available throughout the county. - leading camp wheez and providing physicians and support staff for this weeklong summer camp for children living with asthma. - collaborating with santa barbara neighborhood clinics to provide diagnostic care and specialty medical services to residents who could otherwise not afford these tests. - providing reliable health and resource information free of charge to any community member, patients and non-patients alike, through our health resource center. - participating in a variety of research project with partners such as ucla, the rand corporation and several pharmaceutical companies. - participating in over a dozen annual health fairs and free health screening events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 96.9%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.8%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $418.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3.7M · 32 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $115.9M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 54 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.