Sanlaap North America Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
274607614
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013, Form 990-N 2011
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
9737141316
Rating
50
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Women's Rights

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$139,402
Expenses
$185,737
Assets
$135,464

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sindhura Sarikonda (President)
  • Hoshrav Patel (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Sindhura Sarikonda (President)
  • Reema Moorjani (Treasurer)
  • Hoshrav Patel (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Sanlaap North America rescues, shelters and empowers human trafficking victims. Founded in 2009 we have built a shelter and vocational education center in Kolkata, India. We have also enacted a vocational education program that is currently offered across India for victims of human trafficking.

What it reported doing in 2013

Zesa Vocational Education Program - Our vocational education program provides fabric and jewelry design training, business and life skills education, basic English course, accredited certification and job placement for our girls. The products our girls make during training are sold in our boutique in Kolkata and to U.S. retailers. The profits are used to fund living costs for the girls in our shelters. Our program not only aims to make our organization self-sustaining but it also ensures our girls can be financially independent when they leave our shelters. The Indian government program, NSDC, provided Rs. 15,000 per girl for the training costs - Sanlaap North America funded the remainder of the costs and conducted the training. The program expense covers the cost of training approximately 915 girls across anti-trafficking shelters in India, who will be trained over the course of the next year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 18
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 19.7%; rating input score 20
  • Program expense ratio: 14.8%; rating input score 15

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -33.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -115.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -15.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -29.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 19.7% of revenue deployed · 14.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $28K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 15/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.