Sangamon County Medical Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270352230
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Springfield, IL, USA
Phone
217.726.5106
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$602
Expenses
$7,013
Assets
$31,181
Liabilities
$2,000

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DR CARA VASCONCELLES (PRESIDENT)
  • DR SHREEPADA TRIPATHY (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DR DONALD GRAHAM (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DR CARA VASCONCELLES (PRESIDENT)
  • DR SHREEPADA TRIPATHY (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DR ELI GOODMAN (TREASURER/SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

| **Mission Statement:** To provide leadership in healthcare through service, education and advocacy for our members, patients and community. | image. Some local physicians and surgeons craved more frequent scientific discussions and sought to improve local health conditions. The Springfield Medical Club was formed in the spring of 1894 through the support of ambitious physicians such as Dr. George N. Kreider. Dr. Kreider along with doctors Samuel E. Munson, Lewis C. Taylor and Elmer E. Hagler formed a committee to draft a constitution and bylaws to be presented at the Club's next meeting. At the Club's November 14, 1899 meeting, over which George Kreider presided, the group voted to establish the Sangamon County Medical Society. The 1899 constitution listed the objectives of the Society as the 'cultivation of the science and art of medici.

What it reported doing in 2024

To assist the sangamon county medical society in its program to improve the quality of life through health education and services, and to provide scholarships to physician medical students.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,065%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.45; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -22.8% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.9% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.