Sanford Professional Firefighters Local 3996 of the Iaff Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922297685
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Sanford, FL, USA
Phone
4072449351
Rating
47
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Labor Unions

Reported finances

Revenue
$87,993
Expenses
$77,568
Assets
$83,255
Liabilities
$12,235

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RYAN MARGAGLIOTTI (PRESIDENT (AS OF 01/05/25))
  • GEORGE MILIAN (PRESIDENT (THRU 01/04/25))
  • TRUCKER JANSSEN (VICE PRESIDENT (AS OF 01/05/25))
  • RYAN MARGAGLIOTTI (VICE PRESIDENT (THRU 01/04/25))

People named in this filing

  • RYAN MARGAGLIOTTI (PRESIDENT (AS OF 01/05/25))
  • GEORGE MILIAN (PRESIDENT (THRU 01/04/25))
  • TRUCKER JANSSEN (VICE PRESIDENT (AS OF 01/05/25))

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization is an association of employees who combined to protect and promote the interests of the organization's members through collective bargaining in order to secure better working conditions, wages, and similar benefits.

What it reported doing in 2025

Supporting members in their primary role of safeguarding the community and advocating for health, safety, training, and benefits of members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 22
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 36.5%; rating input score 36
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.8%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -14.3% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 36.5% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.